 News
 Seminars and colloquia
Colloquium
A Few Fairy Math Tales
Dmitri Burago, Penn State University
Thursday, February 9, 2017, 5:05pm5:50pm
Refreshments served 4pm5pm
6 Metrotech Center, Rogers Hall 325
ABSTRACT
The format of this talk is rather nonstandard. It is actually a combination of several minitalks. They would include only motivations, formulations, basic ideas of proof if feasible, and open problems. No technicalities. Each topic would be enough for 2+ lectures. However I know the hard way that in diverse audience, after 1/3 of allocated time 2/3 of people fall asleep or start playing with their tablets. I hope to switch to new topics at approximately right times. I include more topics that I plan to cover for I would be happy to discuss others after the talk or by email/skype. I may make short announcements on these extra topics. The topics will probably be chosen from the list below. I sure will not talk on topics I have spoken already at your university.

A survival guide for feeble fish. How fish can get from A to B in turbulent waters which maybe much fasted than the locomotive speed of the fish provided that there is no largescale drift of the water flow. This is related to homogenization of the Gequation which is believed to govern many combustion processes. Based on a joint work with S. Ivanov and A. Novikov.

How can one discretize elliptic PDEs without using finite elements, triangulations and such? On manifolds and even reasonably “nice” metric measure spaces. A notion of $\rho$Laplacian and its stability. Joint with S. Ivanov and Kurylev.

One of the greatest achievements in dynamical systems in the 20th century is the KAM Theory. It says that a small perturbation of a nondegenerate completely integrable system still has an overwhelming measure of invariant tori with quasiperiodic dynamics. What happens outside KAM tori has been remaining a great mystery. The main quantative invariants so far are entropies. It is easy, by modern standards, to show that topological entropy can be positive. It lives, however, on a zero measure set. We were able to show that metric entropy can become infinite too, under arbitrarily small $C^{\infty}$ perturbations. Furthermore, a slightly modified construction resolves another long–standing problem of the existence of entropy nonexpansive systems. These modified examples do generate positive positive metric entropy is generated in arbitrarily small tubular neighborhood of one trajectory. The technology is based on a metric theory of “dual lens maps” developed by Ivanov and myself, which grew from the “what is inside” topic.

What is inside? Imagine a body with some intrinsic structure, which, as usual, can be thought of as a metric. One knows distances between boundary points (say, by sending waves and measuring how long it takes them to reach specific points on the boundary). One may think of medical imaging or geophysics. This topic is related to the one on minimal fillings, the next one. Joint work with S. Ivanov.
 Area spaces. Given a Riemannian manifold, one can look at rectifiable 1cycles
and their minimal fillings by 2cycles. Actually, one looks at the completion of this Abelian group with a norm. All information about concrete points is gone, this is just an abstract object, more or less an infinite dimensional space with a lattice.
What can we recover back about the manifold? It turns out that, in dimensions bigger than two, just everything: both the topology and Riemannian metric. On a joint work with S. Ivanov, with contributions by C. Sormani and N. Higson.

Ellipticity of surface area in normed space. An array of problems which go back to Busemann. They include minimality of linear subspaces in normed spaces and constructing surfaces with prescribed weighted image under the Gauss map. I will try to give a report of recent developments, in a nutshell. Our interest to these problems came from our attempts to attack questions discussed in “what is inside?” minitalk. Joint with S. Ivanov.

How notions of bilipschitz equivalence and quasiisomorphisms are related? On the language of separated nets, the problem comes from Gromov and Furstenberg (from different angles). What does this have to do with the following question (asked by Moser): Is every positive continuous function bounded away from zero and infinity is the Jacobean Determinant of a Lispchits homeomorphism? What is the relation between there problems? On a joint work with B. Kleiner.

Are there partially hyperbolic diffeos of the threesphere? More generally, of threemanifolds with Abelian fundamental groups or even groups of subexponential growth? There are no topological obstructions. Still, the answer is “no” The result uses a rather complicated study of codim 2 foliations. Joint with (partially) M. Brin and S. Ivanov.

A seemingly naive question. Which groups admit biinvariant metrics of infinite diameter? For unknown reasons, this problem was overlooked. It turned to be not at all easy. Of course, infinite Abelian groups admit such metrics (though it requires a proof). Groups with nontrivial quasimorphisms (such as hyperbolic groups) admit them too. For groups of geometric origin, the story becomes really intriguing. Joint with S. Ivanov and L. Polterovich.

Quite a few stories are left in my left pocket. Possibly: On making decisions under uncertain information, both because we do not know the result of our decisions and we have only probabilistic data.